Despite progress in the understanding of risk factors for aneurysm rupture, the decision whether or not to treat an unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) should be treated remains a challenge. A multidisciplinary team of neurovascular surgeons and interventional radiologists with broad experience in the field should make this decision under critical consideration of their own skills, complication rates and treatment outcomes. Preventive aneurysm occlusion should be proposed whenever the risk of the natural course is estimated higher than the risk associated with the treatment. While the treatment risks have been well documented, a growing body of literature nowadays guides the physician to estimate the risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage from an UIA. Scores like the PHASES score somewhat facilitate the estimation of the rupture risk and prove helpful for the discussion with the patient – whether to treat or whether to follow the aneurysm.
Autoren
- Dr. med. Marco V. Corniola
- Dr. med. Martin N. Stienen
- Dr. med. Renato Gondar
- Prof. Dr. med. Karl Schaller
- Dr. med. Philippe Bijlenga
Publikation
- InFo NEUROLOGIE & PSYCHIATRIE
You May Also Like
- Why lipoprotein(a) is the biggest therapeutic vacuum in cardiology
Lp(a): The underestimated risk factor before the turning point
- Modern system therapeutics for hidradenitis suppurativa
Immunological dysregulation in the sights of several biologics and “small molecules”
- Perimenopausal depression, PMDS and tokophobia
Psychosomatics and mental health in gynecology
- Proteins in wound healing
Do special amino acids lead to success?
- Plastic surgery and reconstructive microsurgery for DFS
Functional limb preservation between infection control, vascular medicine and resurfacing
- Polycystic ovary syndrome 2025/2026
New pathophysiology, updated diagnostics and the age of incretin mimetics
- Heart failure and type 2 diabetes
Oral semaglutide and cardiac decompensation in type 2 diabetes
- Atopic dermatitis as a door opener for an atopic cascade?