Despite progress in the understanding of risk factors for aneurysm rupture, the decision whether or not to treat an unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) should be treated remains a challenge. A multidisciplinary team of neurovascular surgeons and interventional radiologists with broad experience in the field should make this decision under critical consideration of their own skills, complication rates and treatment outcomes. Preventive aneurysm occlusion should be proposed whenever the risk of the natural course is estimated higher than the risk associated with the treatment. While the treatment risks have been well documented, a growing body of literature nowadays guides the physician to estimate the risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage from an UIA. Scores like the PHASES score somewhat facilitate the estimation of the rupture risk and prove helpful for the discussion with the patient – whether to treat or whether to follow the aneurysm.
Autoren
- Dr. med. Marco V. Corniola
- Dr. med. Martin N. Stienen
- Dr. med. Renato Gondar
- Prof. Dr. med. Karl Schaller
- Dr. med. Philippe Bijlenga
Publikation
- InFo NEUROLOGIE & PSYCHIATRIE
You May Also Like
- Heart rhythm
From harmonious symphony to age-related dissonance
- Precision therapy
Targeted MET inhibition after progression with osimertinib
- Chronic cough
Differential diagnostic detective work and trial therapies
- Cancer in Europe: facts and analysis
New Health Policy Report published
- Glomerulonephritis: IgA nephropathy
Pathogenesis-based and nephroprotective therapeutic approaches
- Lavender oil preparation: long-term use and use in adolescents
New database analysis closes important knowledge gaps
- Chronic musculoskeletal pain
How can the use of analgesics be optimized in multimodal therapy?
- Postmenopausal osteoporosis: long-term therapy concepts