Medizinonline Medizinonline
  • News
    • News
    • Market & Medicine
  • Patients
    • Disease patterns
    • Diagnostics
    • Therapy
  • Partner Content
    • Diabetes
      • Dia-Month Club – Type 2 Diabetes
      • Diabetes in Motion
    • Gastroenterology
      • IBD matters
    • Oncology
      • Swiss Oncology in motion
    • Orthopedics
      • Osteoporosis in motion
  • Departments
    • Allergology and clinical immunology
    • General Internal Medicine
    • Anesthesiology
    • Angiology
    • Surgery
    • Dermatology and venereology
    • Endocrinology and Diabetology
    • Nutrition
    • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
    • Genetics
    • Geriatrics
    • Gynecology
    • Hematology
    • Infectiology
    • Cardiology
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Emergency and intensive care medicine
    • Nuclear Medicine
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • ORL
    • Orthopedics
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharmacology and toxicology
    • Pharmaceutical medicine
    • Phlebology
    • Physical medicine and rehabilitation
    • Pneumology
    • Prevention and health care
    • Psychiatry and psychotherapy
    • Radiology
    • Forensic Medicine
    • Rheumatology
    • Sports Medicine
    • Traumatology and trauma surgery
    • Tropical and travel medicine
    • Urology
    • Dentistry
  • CME & Congresses
    • CME continuing education
    • Congress Reports
    • Congress calendar
  • Practice
    • Noctimed
    • Practice Management
    • Jobs
    • Interviews
  • Log In
  • Register
  • My account
  • Contact
  • Publications
  • Contact
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Français
  • Italiano
  • Português
  • Español
Subscribe
Medizinonline Medizinonline
Medizinonline Medizinonline
  • News
    • News
    • Market & Medicine
  • Patienten
    • Krankheitsbilder
    • Diagnostik
    • Therapie
  • Partner Content
    • Diabetes
      • Dia-Month Club – Type 2 Diabetes
      • Diabetes in Motion
    • Gastroenterology
      • IBD matters
    • Oncology
      • Swiss Oncology in motion
    • Orthopedics
      • Osteoporosis in motion
    • Phytotherapie
    • Rheumatology
  • Departments
    • Fachbereiche 1-13
      • Allergology and clinical immunology
      • General Internal Medicine
      • Anesthesiology
      • Angiology
      • Surgery
      • Dermatology and venereology
      • Endocrinology and Diabetology
      • Nutrition
      • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
      • Genetics
      • Geriatrics
      • Gynecology
      • Hematology
    • Fachbereiche 14-26
      • Infectiology
      • Cardiology
      • Nephrology
      • Neurology
      • Emergency and intensive care medicine
      • Nuclear Medicine
      • Oncology
      • Ophthalmology
      • ORL
      • Orthopedics
      • Pediatrics
      • Pharmacology and toxicology
      • Pharmaceutical medicine
    • Fachbereiche 26-38
      • Phlebology
      • Physical medicine and rehabilitation
      • Phytotherapy
      • Pneumology
      • Prevention and health care
      • Psychiatry and psychotherapy
      • Radiology
      • Forensic Medicine
      • Rheumatology
      • Sports Medicine
      • Traumatology and trauma surgery
      • Tropical and travel medicine
      • Urology
      • Dentistry
  • CME & Congresses
    • CME continuing education
    • Congress Reports
    • Congress calendar
  • Practice
    • Noctimed
    • Practice Management
    • Jobs
    • Interviews
Login

Sie haben noch keinen Account? Registrieren

  • How does the immunochemical test perform in colorectal cancer screening?

Mortality reduction is seen earlier than with guaiac-based assays

    • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
    • News
    • Oncology
    • RX
    • Studies
  • 3 minute read

Screening programs using the guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) for early detection of colorectal cancer are known to result in a reduction in disease-specific mortality. Testing methods based on immunochemical detection reactions (FIT) are considered more sensitive, which is why an Italian study has now tested what effect such screening programs have on mortality.

First, Zorzi et al. disease-specific mortality in the Veneto region of Italy, where 50-69 year-olds have been asked to participate in a screening program with immunochemical testing procedures since 2002. If the test result is positive, each patient is referred to colonoscopy. Second, the researchers evaluated colorectal cancer incidence data between 1995 and 2007, as well as rates of major surgical resections (2001-2012).

In addition, they divided the region into two areas and compared the respective mortality rates: In one, screening had been introduced early, between 2002 and 2004; in the other, screening efforts did not start until 2008 and 2009.

The sooner the better

Main conclusion of the study: compared with the period before the program was introduced, mortality rates between 2006 and 2011 were significantly 22% lower in areas where screening had been introduced earlier than in other areas. Prior to the start of the program, the areas studied had had comparable mortality. This is not surprising – the earlier early detection is implemented in a region, the faster effects on mortality are found. More relevant is the fact that the mortality benefit was seen as early as four years after the introduction of screening, and thus earlier than with guaiac-based methods. After ten years, the mortality reduction was 22%, which is also more pronounced than the known values of gFOBT (population-based studies of gFOBT screening programs in different countries achieved values of 10-16%). According to the authors, this could also be due to better compliance with the FIT or the fact that more of those invited to the screening actually took part in it.

Between 2006 and 2011, mortality in areas with early adoption of the test decreased by 24% (22% in men, 32% in women) compared with 1995-2000. Women thus benefited more from preventive care than men. According to the authors, it should not be forgotten that throughout the study period, treatment options and efficacy also evolved, which could have a partial impact on mortality.

Incidence and surgical resections

Incidence and surgical resection rates peaked at the beginning of the screening effort. While incidence returned to baseline levels between 2006 and 2007 in early-screened areas, the rate of surgical resection after 2007 actually fell below initial levels (ten years after initiation, it was 30% lower). According to the authors, this is also related to the fact that endoscopic resection was possible in almost 20% of cases detected by screening. The initial increase in incidence is self-explanatory: if screening is performed, more carcinomas are found than without screening. The fact that the rate subsequently declined again – and will probably even decline in the long term – is due to the fact that not only full-blown carcinomas but also precancerous lesions (i.e. advanced adenomas) are being detected and removed more frequently. Thus, fewer carcinomas occur overall in the long term. In the present study, the effect on incidence was already apparent in the third year after introduction and thus also earlier than with the gFOBT procedure, where it is usually found only after a long delay.

Source: Zorzi M, et al: Impact on colorectal cancer mortality of screening programs based on the faecal immunochemical test. Gut 2015; 64: 784-790.

InFo ONCOLOGY & HEMATOLOGY 2015; 3(11-12): 3.

Autoren
  • Andreas Grossmann
Publikation
  • InFo ONKOLOGIE & HÄMATOLOGIE
Related Topics
  • Guaiac
Previous Article
  • Book tip

Modern aviation medicine

  • General Internal Medicine
  • News
  • RX
View Post
Next Article
  • Light and climate therapy of atopic dermatitis

Benefits of treatment in the high mountains

  • Allergology and clinical immunology
  • Dermatology and venereology
  • Education
  • Physical medicine and rehabilitation
  • RX
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • 6 min
  • Type 1 Diabetes in Childhood

Early Impairment of Glucagon Counterregulation

    • RX
    • Education
    • Endocrinology and Diabetology
    • Pediatrics
    • Studies
View Post
  • 7 min
  • Psychosis in Parkinson's Disease

Be Careful When Choosing Medications

    • RX
    • Education
    • Geriatrics
    • Neurology
    • Pharmacology and toxicology
    • Psychiatry and psychotherapy
    • Studies
View Post
  • 3 min
  • Esophageal Cancer

A Comparison of Endoscopic and Surgical Innovations

    • RX
    • Education
    • Oncology
    • ORL
    • Studies
View Post
  • 6 min
  • PMR and LVV: Current EULAR Recommendations

Polymyalgia rheumatica, giant cell arteritis, and Takayasu arteritis

    • RX
    • Angiology
    • Congress Reports
    • General Internal Medicine
    • Rheumatology
    • Studies
View Post
  • 5 min
  • Cellular and Systemic Iron Homeostasis

“Steady State” – a delicately balanced equilibrium

    • RX
    • Congress Reports
    • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
    • General Internal Medicine
    • Hematology
View Post
  • 9 min
  • Psychedelic-assisted therapy

Current status of PAT

    • RX
    • CME continuing education
    • General Internal Medicine
    • Pharmacology and toxicology
    • Psychiatry and psychotherapy
    • Studies
View Post
  • 3 min
  • First-line treatment for T2D

SGLT2i, metformin, or both?

    • RX
    • Education
    • Endocrinology and Diabetology
    • Studies
View Post
  • 4 min
  • Biophilic Design of Work Environments

Effects on Health, Well-Being, and Productivity

    • RX
    • General Internal Medicine
    • Practice Management
    • Prevention and health care
    • Studies
  • IBD matters

    Zum Thema
Top CME content
  • 1
    Endometrial carcinoma
  • 2
    Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment of DSPN
  • 3
    Why is it so hard to lose weight?
  • 4
    Four-Legged Medical Assistants – Therapy Dogs in Clinical Settings
  • 5
    Functional limb preservation between infection control, vascular medicine and resurfacing

Newsletter

Sign up and stay up to date

Subscribe
Medizinonline Medizinonline
  • Contact
  • General terms and conditions
  • Imprint

Input your search keywords and press Enter.