What neuroenhancement really improves – and what only works subjectively better. Those who use cognitive performance-enhancing substances particularly frequently. Between Ritalin, Modafinil and coffee, the line between therapy and optimization is blurred. The article classifies prevalences, motivations and risks, explains the mechanisms of action of the most important substance classes and shows why the benefits are often overestimated, with practical tips for medical education in everyday life.
Autoren
- Dr. Ulf Blanke
Publikation
- InFo NEUROLOGIE & PSYCHIATRIE
Related Topics
You May Also Like
- B-cell lymphomas
Bispecific antibodies – mechanisms, evidence and future role
- Dermatoscopic findings of granulomatous diseases
Cutaneous sarcoidosis, necrobiosis lipoidica and granuloma anulare
- Clostridioides difficile infection: specific therapy
Importance of vancomycin and fidaxomicin has increased
- Study report
Asthma exacerbation risk in patients with a psychological comorbidity
- Neuropathies - CIDP
Differentiate chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)
- Treatment of type 2 diabetes: paradigm shift continues
Cardiorenal organ protection is increasingly coming to the fore
- Semaglutide and tirzepatide in HFpEF and T2D/obesity
Prospect of improved cardiovascular prognosis
- Case report: alveolar sarcoidosis