In the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), catheter ablation has developed from a specialized option to the mainstay of a modern rhythm strategy within a decade. In 2025, two developments are shaping the debate: on the one hand, the updated guidelines increasingly anchor ablation as a first-line therapy – for suitable indications – and on the other hand, pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is technically and conceptually challenging the previously dominant thermal procedures – in particular radiofrequency ablation (RF) using the high-power short-duration (HPSD) technique. Randomized studies, registries and safety analyses provide a differentiated picture: PFA is not inferior to conventional thermal ablation in paroxysmal AF, shows procedural advantages and a special safety profile, but brings with it new, characteristic side effects. RF ablation, for its part, has achieved significant efficiency and safety gains with HPSD and optimized workflow standards.
Autoren
- Tanja Schliebe
Publikation
- CARDIOVASC
Related Topics
You May Also Like
- Multiple myeloma
DREAMM-8: Key study in the development of BCMA therapy up to DREAMM-14
- Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation 2025
Pulsed field versus radio frequency – where do we stand?
- Atopic dermatitis
From skin barrier disorder to atopic march?
- From the late residual valve to independent therapy
Tricuspid interventions 2025
- Brain health
News from the Swiss Brain Health Plan (SBHP) 2023-2033
- Friedreich's ataxia
Treatment options have improved
- Focus on prevention
Colorectal cancer screening – an update
- Ulcerative colitis