Cardiogenic shock (CS) is and remains the most dramatic form of acute circulatory failure in cardiology. Despite decades of intensive research, hospital mortality has long remained in the range of 35-50 percent. In 2025, the turning point is less a new “miracle cure” than a new operating system: an internationally uniform language with the SCAI classification, standardized shock pathways, early revascularization according to clear principles, a more cautious view of ECMO, and – following the breakthrough of DanGer-Shock – careful, selective use of microaxial pumps in precisely defined scenarios. Consensus papers and guidelines from 2025 consolidate this paradigm shift: timing, selection and team processes are crucial.
Autoren
- Tanja Schliebe
Publikation
- CARDIOVASC
Related Topics
You May Also Like
- Severe asthma and CRSwNP
Multidisciplinary collaboration between pneumology, allergology and ENT
- Myelofibrosis
New findings on the role of inflammation in pathogenesis
- Incretin mimetics for obesity and prediabetes
Liraglutide, semaglutide and tirzepatide: considerable evidence base
- Treatment of infected wounds and wounds at risk of infection
Focus on an interdisciplinary perspective
- Chronic and hard-to-heal wounds
Benefit from the advantages of outpatient negative pressure wound therapy
- COPD
Even a single moderate exacerbation can be a predictor of mortality
- HER2+ metastatic breast cancer
New therapeutic standards with SHR-A 1811
- Angina tonsillaris: clinical management