Cardiogenic shock (CS) is and remains the most dramatic form of acute circulatory failure in cardiology. Despite decades of intensive research, hospital mortality has long remained in the range of 35-50 percent. In 2025, the turning point is less a new “miracle cure” than a new operating system: an internationally uniform language with the SCAI classification, standardized shock pathways, early revascularization according to clear principles, a more cautious view of ECMO, and – following the breakthrough of DanGer-Shock – careful, selective use of microaxial pumps in precisely defined scenarios. Consensus papers and guidelines from 2025 consolidate this paradigm shift: timing, selection and team processes are crucial.
Autoren
- Tanja Schliebe
Publikation
- CARDIOVASC
Related Topics
You May Also Like
- Chronic inflammation as a driver of ageing
Immunosenescence and inflammaging
- Evidence, limitations and practical implications
Phytotherapy for anxiety disorders
- Case report: Hiccups after ketoacidosis
Nebulized lidocaine brings relief
- Hidradenitis suppurativa: biologics reduce inflammatory processes
Treatment recommendations depend on the severity and inflammatory activity
- Dizziness as a leading symptom: new consensus paper
Current recommendations for handling in everyday practice
- Endometrial carcinoma, malignant melanoma and NSCLC in focus
Personalized mRNA and neoantigen vaccines in oncology
- Consequences for pathophysiology, clinic and therapy
The inflammatory subgroup of major depression
- Clostridioides difficile infection: specific therapy