Cardiogenic shock (CS) is and remains the most dramatic form of acute circulatory failure in cardiology. Despite decades of intensive research, hospital mortality has long remained in the range of 35-50 percent. In 2025, the turning point is less a new “miracle cure” than a new operating system: an internationally uniform language with the SCAI classification, standardized shock pathways, early revascularization according to clear principles, a more cautious view of ECMO, and – following the breakthrough of DanGer-Shock – careful, selective use of microaxial pumps in precisely defined scenarios. Consensus papers and guidelines from 2025 consolidate this paradigm shift: timing, selection and team processes are crucial.
Autoren
- Tanja Schliebe
Publikation
- CARDIOVASC
Related Topics
You May Also Like
- Prostate Cancer
Intracrine and Metabolic Tumor Adaptation Under Androgen Deprivation
- Alopecia areata in children, adolescents, and adults
New Guideline Classifies the Evidence Base for Topical and Systemic Therapies
- Cardiology and Nutrition
Ultra-Processed Foods and Cardiovascular Risk—The New AHA Position
- Actinic keratoses
Targeted Treatment of Multiple AK Lesions—Balancing Efficacy and Convenience
- Obesity: A Multimodal and Interdisciplinary Approach
New Swiss Clinical Practice Guideline Provides Guidance
- cSCC: Personalizing Treatment Strategies and Follow-up Care Plans
Comprehensive risk stratification is no simple matter: what’s new?
- Baxdrostat – a new class of drugs for treating difficult-to-control hypertension
First Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitor Is Here
- Geriatric Small-Cell Lung Cancer