Cardiogenic shock (CS) is and remains the most dramatic form of acute circulatory failure in cardiology. Despite decades of intensive research, hospital mortality has long remained in the range of 35-50 percent. In 2025, the turning point is less a new “miracle cure” than a new operating system: an internationally uniform language with the SCAI classification, standardized shock pathways, early revascularization according to clear principles, a more cautious view of ECMO, and – following the breakthrough of DanGer-Shock – careful, selective use of microaxial pumps in precisely defined scenarios. Consensus papers and guidelines from 2025 consolidate this paradigm shift: timing, selection and team processes are crucial.
Autoren
- Tanja Schliebe
Publikation
- CARDIOVASC
Related Topics
You May Also Like
- Plastic surgery and reconstructive microsurgery for DFS
Functional limb preservation between infection control, vascular medicine and resurfacing
- SURPASS-CVOT
Tirzepatide versus Dulaglutide in T2D with ASCVD
- Secondary prevention after ACS: individually optimized lipid management
Trend towards early combination therapy and new strategies for lowering Lp(a)
- Pediatric Brain Tumors
Psychiatry versus Neuro-Oncology: Diagnostic Pitfalls
- What the latest studies on the entire EF spectrum mean for clinical practice
Heart Failure – The 2026 Evidence Update
- Acute ischemic stroke
Alteplase and Tenecteplase Are on the Same Level
- CKD in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Evidence-Based, Optimized Treatment
SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists: significant improvement in renal outcomes
- Wearables: screening via smartwatch?